Post's which are submitted as evidence but draw false, erroneous or unfounded conclusions will not be accepted for discussion.
Post's which have no evidence to support their allegations will not be accepted for discussion.
Post's which do not offer evidence based conclusions but are seen as circular specious devices will not be accepted for discussion,
Post's where evidence offered is dubious in nature or shows signs of manipulation in some way will not be accepted for discussion.
Quote:
Definition of specious:
1. Containing fundamental errors in reasoning: fallacious, false, illogical, invalid, sophistic, spurious, unsound.
2.Devoid of truth: counterfactual, false, spurious, truthless, untrue, untruthful, wrong. See true/false.
Source: http://www.answers.com/specious&r=67
Whereas the above list is not exhaustive and may be updated in the future it does offer members some general guidelines for submitting evidence for discussion. If a members post is not accepted for discussion this does not suggest that they have been penalised in any way but merely that the subject matter of their post did not pass the above criteria.
